CLS HOMEPAGE

FOR LAW STUDENTS

CHRISTIAN LEGAL AID

ATTORNEY MINISTRIES

CLS HOMEPAGE

FOR LAW STUDENTS

ATTORNEY MINISTRIES

RELIGIOUS FREEDOM & LIFE

CLS HOMEPAGE

ATTORNEY MINISTRIES
CHRISTIAN LEGAL AID

RELIGIOUS FREEDOM & LIFE

CLS HOMEPAGE

FOR LAW STUDENTS

CHRISTIAN LEGAL AID

RELIGIOUS FREEDOM & LIFE

Cases

Starkey v. Archdiocese of Indianapolis

CASE STATUS:

Active

CLS ROLE:

Amicus

STATE:

Indiana

DECIDING COURT:

Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals

CASE DESCRIPTION:

In August 2021, the district court granted summary judgment dismissing Starkey’s employment discrimination suit. The court found that the undisputed facts showed Starkey “performed vital religious duties.” Roncalli High School had entrusted Starkey with the tasks of guiding students as they mature and grow into adulthood, communicating the Catholic faith to students, and helping shape the religious and spiritual environment at the school – all of which are vital religious duties.

A religious school must have the freedom to ensure that an employee’s counseling of adolescents, as well as her example of personal conduct, supports its religiously grounded moral standards. Accordingly, the district court granted summary judgment finding Starkey a “minister” and dismissing her suit under the First Amendment’s ministerial exception. Christian Legal Society (CLS) fully supports that conclusion.

Starkey appealed the district court decision to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. On January 18, 2022, CLS filed an amicus brief in support of Roncalli High School and the Archdiocese of Indiana. CLS’ brief emphasized that, while the district court’s decision was correct and should be affirmed, the Seventh Circuit could also affirm the decision on an alternative ground – the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (“RFRA”), which prohibits the federal government from imposing a substantial burden on religious exercise unless the application of that burden furthers a compelling governmental interest and does so by the least restrictive means. The brief pointed out that whether or not Starkey is a “minister,” the undisputed facts show the religious importance of her job functions. Those facts show that penalizing the Archdiocese for dismissing her would substantially burdens its religious exercise.

On July 28, 2022, the Seventh Circuit upheld the district court decision based on the ministerial exception. The lower court had granted summary judgment dismissing Starkey’s employment discrimination suit, finding for the school and the archdiocese on the basis of the ministerial exception because the undisputed facts showed Starkey performed vital religious duties. Two of the judges on the Seventh Circuit panel agreed with the trial judge that the ministerial exception governed this case, and the third judge in a concurrence thought that the Title VII religious exemption doomed Ms. Starkey’s claim.

ABOUT THE CENTER

About

The Center Team

History

Contact Us

Cases

ISSUES

Religious Freedom

Life

Conscience

Education

Free Speech

ABA Accountability Project

RESOURCES

For Attorneys

For Individuals

For Churches

For Nonprofits

NEED HELP?

Help with Religious Freedom

Find a CLA Clinic

Find a Christian Attorney

Partner with CLS

Donate Now

Ways to Give to CLS

|CLS - Christian Legal Society - Center for Law & Religious Freedom © 2024|